However, this contrasts with the classroom teacher who is using technology
as a tool. The requisite skills are the same as his/her computer teacher
colleague. Depending on the subject and level being taught by the classroom
teacher, some or all of the eight requisite skills will be needed. However,
the curriculum goal is dramatically different. The classroom teacher's
responsibility is to teach subject content, which is bound to a board
of education approved curriculum. Integrating technology into his/her
subject instruction as appropriate or creating a "technology-rich" classroom
environment and "infusing" it throughout most classroom activities achieves
this aim. As contrasted with his/her computer specialist colleague,
the classroom teacher's responsibility is to achieve mastery of content.
Therefore, the measurement of success will not be how well students
use computers or a piece of software but how well they have learned
subject matter.
Many classroom teachers are insecure about using technology, because
they lack a philosophy for its use. Often they incorrectly compare themselves
to the technology "guru" in the technology lab. This is an inappropriate
comparison. The technology instructor would not be expected to be a
master of classroom subject matter. Similarly the classroom teacher
is not expected to be a technology hardware/software expert, but to
use technology as a effective tool for curricular instruction .I believe
this model provides a viable context and philosophy for teacher technology
use.
About the Author:
Professor Jim Nichols
Chairman, Nyack College Dept of Ed
Nyack, NY 10960
Email: nicholsj@nyack.edu
©2007 Professor Jim Nichols, All rights
reserved.