Unregistered
05-19-2006, 12:50 PM
Hi,
I have a question re. assessment and evaluation using a differentiated learning model and its effects on motivating higher achieving students.
Although I am an educator my question is posed as a parent of 3 children at the elementary level. My daughter in grade 3 has an inexperienced occasional teacher replacing her classroom teacher who is on a maternity leave. Just yesterday she received a level 3- on a math test and was mortified (she is straight A or level 4+) student. She was upset because a fellow classmate was given a different math test and achieved a grade higher than hers (and was bragging). This fellow classmate doesn't have an IEP (Ontario Canada's term for: individualized education plan) which would be indicated on summative evaluation or report card. (ie. although his grades might seem high his programme was modified and this is indicated on his report card).
If my daughter is being held to a higher standard than other students, then how can evaluation be fair? She is not a competitive child, but when we look at outcomes and measure success through the grade assigned at the end of the learning process, then it seems only natural for children to compare their grades. It is unfair, and I fear will ultimately be unmotivating for children to continue to push themselves when their end results may be perceived as being the same as others. Sorry to ramble here, but as an academic student this is where she shines in school. She isn't an athlete, or artist, or singer and doing well in school is her "thing". If she is no longer afforded the abilty to shine among her peers, due to inequity in assessment and holding students of differing abilities to different standards, then she is having something important taken away from her because of this model.
Just yesterday she partook in a Track and Field meet and tried her very best but came away with no ribbons. They didn't have different events for students of different physical abilities. They all ran the same 800 metre race and only the 3 winners received ribbons for their efforts. She did well for herself, but only the winners "shone" in the eyes of another child. I'm not sure if my point was made clear through this analogy, but I am concerned about assessment and evaluation using the differentiated learning model and how this will affect the moral, and motivation of high achievers.
Any enlightenment on this issue would be greatly appreciated. I am not completely familiar with this model and am perhaps, misunderstanding its implications and implementation.
Thanks,
Hope
I have a question re. assessment and evaluation using a differentiated learning model and its effects on motivating higher achieving students.
Although I am an educator my question is posed as a parent of 3 children at the elementary level. My daughter in grade 3 has an inexperienced occasional teacher replacing her classroom teacher who is on a maternity leave. Just yesterday she received a level 3- on a math test and was mortified (she is straight A or level 4+) student. She was upset because a fellow classmate was given a different math test and achieved a grade higher than hers (and was bragging). This fellow classmate doesn't have an IEP (Ontario Canada's term for: individualized education plan) which would be indicated on summative evaluation or report card. (ie. although his grades might seem high his programme was modified and this is indicated on his report card).
If my daughter is being held to a higher standard than other students, then how can evaluation be fair? She is not a competitive child, but when we look at outcomes and measure success through the grade assigned at the end of the learning process, then it seems only natural for children to compare their grades. It is unfair, and I fear will ultimately be unmotivating for children to continue to push themselves when their end results may be perceived as being the same as others. Sorry to ramble here, but as an academic student this is where she shines in school. She isn't an athlete, or artist, or singer and doing well in school is her "thing". If she is no longer afforded the abilty to shine among her peers, due to inequity in assessment and holding students of differing abilities to different standards, then she is having something important taken away from her because of this model.
Just yesterday she partook in a Track and Field meet and tried her very best but came away with no ribbons. They didn't have different events for students of different physical abilities. They all ran the same 800 metre race and only the 3 winners received ribbons for their efforts. She did well for herself, but only the winners "shone" in the eyes of another child. I'm not sure if my point was made clear through this analogy, but I am concerned about assessment and evaluation using the differentiated learning model and how this will affect the moral, and motivation of high achievers.
Any enlightenment on this issue would be greatly appreciated. I am not completely familiar with this model and am perhaps, misunderstanding its implications and implementation.
Thanks,
Hope